CryptoPotato
CryptoPotato
  • Crypto News
  • Margin Trading
  • Guides
    • Bitcoin & Crypto Guides 101
    • Bitcoin For Beginners
    • Editorials
  • DeFi & NFT
  • Buy
  • Language
    • Spanish
    • Turkish
    • German
    • Bulgarian
  • Crypto News
  • Bitcoin For Beginners
  • Cryptocurrency Guides 101
  • Editorials
  • Bitcoin & Crypto Margin Trading
  • DeFi & NFT News
  • Bitcoin Price Analysis
  • Ethereum (ETH) Price Analysis
  • Ripple (XRP) Price Analysis
  • Market Updates
  • Interviews
  • Buy Bitcoin with Card
  • CryptoPotato Spanish
  • CryptoPotato Turkey
  • CryptoPotato Germany
  • CryptoPotato Bulgaria
  • Market Updates
  • BTC Analysis
  • ETH Analysis
  • XRP Analysis
  • Interviews
CryptoPotato
CryptoPotato
  • Crypto News
  • Margin Trading
  • Guides
    • Bitcoin & Crypto Guides 101
    • Bitcoin For Beginners
    • Editorials
  • DeFi & NFT
  • Buy
  • Language
    • Spanish
    • Turkish
    • German
    • Bulgarian
  • Crypto News
  • Bitcoin For Beginners
  • Cryptocurrency Guides 101
  • Editorials
  • Bitcoin & Crypto Margin Trading
  • DeFi & NFT News
  • Bitcoin Price Analysis
  • Ethereum (ETH) Price Analysis
  • Ripple (XRP) Price Analysis
  • Market Updates
  • Interviews
  • Buy Bitcoin with Card
  • CryptoPotato Spanish
  • CryptoPotato Turkey
  • CryptoPotato Germany
  • CryptoPotato Bulgaria
Home » Crypto News » Pac Finance Sudden Parameter Change Sparks $24 Million Liquidation

Pac Finance Sudden Parameter Change Sparks $24 Million Liquidation

Author: Wayne Jones

Last Updated Apr 12, 2024 @ 13:27

The massive user liquidations were triggered by a sudden change in the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio.

Getting your audio player ready...

Pac Finance, a lending app on Blast, has had its users report a $24 million liquidation on April 11 due to a sudden change in parameters by the developer wallet.

Mass liquidations are common for leveraged traders who borrow crypto, but they often occur due to fluctuations in the market, not protocol parameter changes.

Pac Finance LTV Change Leads to Liquidation

Pac Finance is a platform where crypto holders can earn interest by lending their assets. The app implements a loan-to-value ratio (LTV), which limits borrowers to loans equivalent to a certain percentage of their collateral to ensure repayment. Typically, the development team announces changes to the LTV beforehand.

However, on April 11 at 1:06 am UTC, according to Blast network’s blockchain data, a developer wallet changed the LTV for Renzo Restaked Ether (ezETH) to 60% without prior announcement. The sudden adjustment in LTV parameters has sparked concerns within the community following a $24 million liquidation just seconds after the update.

Developer kydo.eth from EigenLabs initially brought light to the information, prompting Pac Finance users to voice their grievances and demand explanations on the protocol’s official Discord server.

We should be grateful that the incident was limited to only a 26m liquidation 🙏

Please, LRT protocols, discourage your users from participating in these protocols⛔️

So what happened?

$26m got liquidated on @pac_finance , a lending protocol on blast.

An EOA wallet (0xae),… https://t.co/76v0tekNmr

— kydo.eth/acc 🦇🔊 (@0xkydo) April 11, 2024

In response, the team’s Discord moderator, Bountydreams, stated they are attempting to contact the team for clarification. However, no response has been received as of writing these lines.

Protocol Change Raises Concerns Over Security Issues

According to smart contract developer Roffet.eth, the parameter change led to the liquidation of many ezETH leveraging farmers since they now violated the protocol’s collateral rules. Roffet criticized the change as “arbitrary,” as it allegedly occurred without warning.

Parsec Finance founder Will Sheehan also condemned the change, noting that it happened without warning. Sheehan estimated that borrowers incurred losses of approximately $24 million in collateral, as their assets were automatically sold off to settle their loans due to the protocol change.

Liquidation threshold was updated, seemingly without warning to trigger these liquidations, 2 blocks later $24m liquidated, h/t to @roffett_eth https://t.co/KLXv5o1Jk9 pic.twitter.com/QXzlFpwKrR

— Will Sheehan (@wilburforce_) April 11, 2024

The incident on Blast adds to a series of security issues within the platform. In early March, Blast’s lending agreement Orbit Lending faced criticism from Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) for discrepancies in its liquidation threshold. Although the agreement stated an 83% liquidation threshold, it was reported that liquidation occurred at 80%. However, the project later compensated affected users.

In addition, Blast’s ecological project Munchables suffered an attack recently, leading to suspicions of a problem with the locking contract and resulting in the theft of 17,400 ETH (valued at approximately $62.3 million). SomaXBT revealed that Munchables had previously engaged an unknown security team, EntersoftTeam, to issue an audit report to reduce audit fees.

SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).

LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

Tags: DeFi
Enjoy reading? Share with your friends
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram

About The Author

Wayne Jones
More posts by this author

Wayne is a dynamic part-time trader with an impressive eye for detail. His passion for understanding financial systems has led to an intriguing interest in blockchain technology, and he enjoys exploring and writing about cryptocurrencies. Possessing a keen intellect and diligent work ethic, he stays up-to-date on the latest industry trends, regularly sharing his insights in articles and professional presentations.

Join Our Community

FacebookX YouTubeTelegram


Editorials
5 Best Meme Coin Presales to Watch in May 2025

5 Best Meme Coin Presales to Watch in May 2025

Toobit Review 2025: Is Toobit a Safe Crypto Exchange?

Toobit Review 2025: Is Toobit a Safe Crypto Exchange?

Hyperliquid Bridge: How to Bridge USDC to Hyperliquid

Hyperliquid Bridge: How to Bridge USDC to Hyperliquid

11 Best Crypto Presales to Consider in May 2025

11 Best Crypto Presales to Consider in May 2025

Need for Speed – Only Ultra-Fast Blockchains Will Win the Adoption Race (Opinion)

Need for Speed – Only Ultra-Fast Blockchains Will Win the Adoption Race (Opinion)

The 5 Best Bitcoin Mining Pools in 2025: Complete Guide

The 5 Best Bitcoin Mining Pools in 2025: Complete Guide

The 5 Best Crypto Staking Platforms in 2025: Everything You Need to Know

The 5 Best Crypto Staking Platforms in 2025: Everything You Need to Know

Join Our Newsletter
Become a CryptoPotato VIP
One Weekly Email Can Change Your Crypto Life.
Sign-up FREE to receive our extended weekly market update and coin analysis report
We NEVER send spam. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing!
Footer Logo
About
Advertise on CryptoPotato
About Us | Contact Us | Careers
Editorial Policy
Terms of service | Privacy Policy | GDPR
More Sections
IEO List | Evaluations
Airdrops
Scholarship
Disclaimer
Disclaimer: Information found on CryptoPotato is those of writers quoted. It does not represent the opinions of CryptoPotato on whether to buy, sell, or hold any investments. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use provided information at your own risk. Full disclaimer
© Copyright CryptoPotato 2016 - 2025
Scroll to top
One Daily Email Can Change Your Crypto Life.

Sign-up FREE to receive our extended daily market update and coin analysis report

We never send SPAM. You can unsubscribe at any moment
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing!